The DC Preservation League and two District residents have filed suit in an effort to stop the Trump administration’s takeover and proposed redevelopment of East Potomac Park and its public golf course in Washington, D.C.
The plaintiffs filed for an injunction Friday in U.S. District Court, arguing that plans to transform East Potomac Golf Links into a championship-caliber course threaten the park’s historic character and public accessibility. The legal action follows the recent dumping of dirt and debris from the White House East Wing ballroom demolition onto the golf course grounds — activity the plaintiffs describe as “unlawful and possibly hazardous.”
In court filings reviewed by The Athletic, the group contends that the administration’s actions contradict Congress’s original 1897 mandate that the land be “forever held and used as a park for the recreation and pleasure of the people.”
“The East Potomac Golf Links is a unique cultural landscape that reflects the history of recreation in the nation’s capital,” said Rebecca Miller, executive director of the Preservation League, in a statement announcing the lawsuit. “Altering its historic character would undermine a site meant to be accessible to the public.”
The lawsuit was filed by the Preservation League along with residents Dave Roberts and Alex Dickson. They are represented by Democracy Forward, a legal organization focused on litigation and public policy advocacy.
Named as defendants are Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and National Park Service acting director Jessica Brown.
“We are acting to save this priceless part of our national park system from being another casualty of a reckless administration,” said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward. “We are honored to partner with our plaintiffs in pushing back against this unlawful assault on cherished public spaces.”
According to the filing, the National Park Service has begun depositing approximately 30,000 cubic yards of fill — including wires, pipes and bricks — from the East Wing demolition at the golf course site. The plaintiffs warn the material could contain hazardous substances such as lead and asbestos, given the East Wing’s 1942 construction and later renovations.
The complaint references a separate lawsuit brought by the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization against the National Park Service over the lack of an environmental assessment tied to the demolition project. It also cites remarks made by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on NBC’s Meet the Press in October, when he acknowledged that “parts of the East Wing could have been asbestos.”
Beyond environmental concerns, the plaintiffs argue that converting East Potomac into a tournament-ready course would likely increase maintenance costs and green fees, placing the facility out of reach for many local golfers.
“The envisioned course would be of a piece with the numerous championship-style golf courses that President Trump, who fancies himself an avid golfer, owns elsewhere,” the lawsuit states. “Predictably, the cost of a tee time at such a venue would inflate accordingly.”
The dispute stems in part from the administration’s Dec. 31 termination notice to the National Links Trust, which held a 50-year lease from the National Park Service to operate East Potomac and two other D.C. public courses at relatively affordable rates. The administration cited missed renovation deadlines, though the nonprofit has maintained it did not violate the lease. Lawmakers have questioned whether the required 45-day cure period was provided before termination.
Among them is Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who joined three other Democrats in sending a letter to federal officials asserting that the lease was illegally terminated.
“The public has a right to know what legal justification the administration has for this takeover, as well as any public health and safety risks resulting from their activities,” Van Hollen said in a statement. “These historic courses should remain safe and accessible to the local community, instead of whatever vanity project Trump has next in mind.”
The case now places the future of one of Washington’s most historic public golf courses in the hands of a federal judge, with preservation advocates seeking to preserve both its heritage and its affordability.










